My YouTube Videos

Thank you for visiting my site! Please check out my YouTube videos.

Here’s my first video. It is an introduction to my campaign:

Here’s my second video. It talks a bit about myself, and asks for people to get the word out about my campaign:

Here’s a video of my campaign kickoff speech given at Kirby’s Beer Store on March 3, 2024. Thank you to Carrie Nation and The Speakeasy for allowing me to preempt their show with my speech. Thanks to Kathy for recording this!

Thank you for checking them out! Please share the videos all around! Thank you!

Don’t forget to check out my articles!

Thank you for your support! It’s an uphill road ahead, but this is how it begins. :]

Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President

A Bill to Limit the Complexity of Bills Introduced to Congress:

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE HERE ASSEMBLED THAT:

Section 1. All bills be limited to one topic, including any direct legislatorial or procedural changes pertaining to the topic. And that all bills which may be considered separate topics be split into individual topics before being presented to Congress, in the spirit of sharing clarity. Topics may be reliant upon another bill being passed, and such bills may be written with a preamble of “1Considering Bill xx [and xx, etc.] to be passed into law, BE IT ENACTED…”

1 All intended effects in law shall be presented by the bill writer at the time of presentation to Congress, including specific references where it would affect current and/or pending bills and/or laws. Any pending bills or laws unbeknownst to the bill writer must be presented by Congress members in the know, if consideration is deserved. Only by passing into law of a new bill may any law be interpreted as being bound to another bill or law, giving due consideration to the powers vested in the Judicial Branch of the U.S. A.

Section 2. Terms:

“One Topic” – So far as a topic may be perceived to include a very similar or related topic, it should not.

    Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President

    The Two Party System…Ha

    So, how does the two party system benefit you? How does the two party system benefit America? How does the two party system benefit itself?

    The two party system narrows down your choices to two people who carry opposing views on many things. This way, you have both sides not necessarily saying to vote for their candidate, but saying not to vote for the other candidate. Is that the way it should be? Could there be a system where we choose a decent candidate, not just someone who is “not him/her”? (Could one side “throw the election” by having a terrible candidate?)

    I think if we got rid of the party system all together, there would be more money available for other people to run, the parties just gravitate the money toward themselves. Did you know that much of elected officials’ time is used making phone calls and making appearances at events to gain more money for their party? Why not gain money for their personal election fund; or better yet, have the election system be affordable enough so they do not have to spend a bunch of time on sales calls?

    What does the party system provide for The People of The United States of America? From my standpoint, it provides us a narrowed pool of candidates, almost fed to us. It assures that there will be people that, no matter what is the right decision, will choose whatever their party says, since they are wanting to be re-elected.  (As a disclaimer, there are some elected officials, currently belonging to parties, who are good for The United States.)

    As nice as it would be to have a no party system, we have sunk ourselves into a hole which will be difficult to get out of. The party system assures the ability to narrow electable candidates, thus making the people backing those candidates a lot of money. If we were to end this system, those “backers” would miss out on the big bucks they so desperately desire. Since they have had the big bucks for so long, they are pretty well settled in, but there is a way to dislodge them.

    More involvement from good, unaffiliated people could be the first step.

    Term limits and more people in the Electoral College could be the next steps… There are 538 members of the Electoral College, which is one for every 700,000 people. Do you know how many the constitution says we can have? It says we can have one for every 30,000 people, depending on interpretation.1 Though many people think a bigger government is a bad thing, it would ensure a more diverse set of voices would be heard, instead of two voices. Did you know that no matter the vote in some states, parties can buy an Electoral Collegian’s vote? Does that seem like a huge flaw?

    Another thing the two party system leaves us subject to is a single party supermajority. This vulnerability in the system was exploited by the current policy makers in 2009-2011. I will continue with that thought soon.

    Did I get your blood boiling?…. Good. Let other people know what you think and let’s get this ball rolling. NO MORE PARTY SYSTEM! NO MORE PARTY SYSTEM!

    If you could describe to me the benefit of a two party system, I will hear you out. Add a comment.

    1My interpretation of the constitution is thus: Article II, Section 1, second paragraph: “Each state shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature therof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress:…”

    ~I take this as meaning that we can have as many Electors as each State is entitled to, and I take that it does not mean that the number must exactly equal the current number of Senators and Representatives.

    This point brings us to Article I, Section 2, third paragraph: “…The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative…” along with Article 1, Section 3, first paragraph: “The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State…”

    ~These sentences are where I got that 30,000 deal from.

    Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President

    To Believe or To Doubt? That is the Question.

    —This was originally posted long ago. Enjoy. —

    Truth does not cease because people give up believing it. – Edward Norman

    Truth does not arise because people do believe it. – Me, Paul C.

    **Please do not read this entry if you are a child. Ask your parents if they would like to read this before you do. Thanks **

    For what reason is it an admirable quality for a person to have belief in the unbelievable? Is that admiration genuine? Or, is it something that is suggested to people by the ones with the unbelievable claims? Does having faith ever hurt the faithful? Does having faith ever help the faithful? Finally, does having faith hurt or help the people or idea you are holding faith in?

    Say I am telling you a story about what happened to me yesterday…

    “I was chopping vegetables in the kitchen when the knife accidentally slipped and I chopped my whole finger off. I was worried, but I petitioned to the mouse in the wall, ‘Oh little mouse, use your great power to heal my finger.’ Then I pressed my finger back on and it was magically healed. See?” [Me showing you my finger intact, with no sign of being cut.]

    “The little mouse in the wall is magical and I knew it. Here, let me show you. Throw your keys out the window and a bird will bring them back. All you need to do is ask the little mouse if it will use its great power to return your keys.”

    -Would you throw your keys and ask the little mouse if it could use its great powers for your will?

    If so, then you do really expect a bird to come flying back with them; or are you just testing to see if the story has any credence?

    If you did not throw them, why do you not believe in the little mouse’s great powers? Is it because this is the first you heard of the little mouse and its power over the elements? Do you not believe because that is just ridiculous all together, the healing of my finger and all?

    So, if you did throw your keys, and a bird did come back with them, would you tell everyone you know of the amazing mouse in my wall? (Maybe then I would ask if you would want to give the little mouse $20 for food.)

    If the keys remained on the ground outside, no bird in sight, would you tell everyone that the mouse refused to use its powers to help you, but it did use its powers to help me with my finger? Would you share with others that the mouse does not have any powers? Furthermore, would you just not tell anyone because the whole thing is ridiculous?

    From what I think, if the bird did return the keys, that would be amazing and a person may want to tell the world. If not, many may chalk it up as ridiculous and not believe that it healed my finger or in its powers over anything.

    Why is this relevant?

    OK, so there are lots of people in the world wanting followers. Many of them require belief in something(s) you were not there to witness yourself. So, why is it that they are all saying that they are telling the truth and you must believe their claims, respectively, for your own salvation? Obviously, if anyone is correct at all, then there are really only a few people telling the whole truth, leaving the rest as being mistaken in their claims.

    Q:Why do many people believe what they do? A: 1. Good Salespeople 2. Tradition 3. It betters their life. 4. They don’t know.

    Why do I say “good salespeople” is a reason why people believe what they do? It is because people wanting you to have faith in them use the best sales and storytelling tactics to beguile their audiences.

    Fear is the best sales tactic. It is used by instilling the idea that the person will need your product (or belief in their claims) to deal with something they fear. I will give an example of product and one of a person wanting your faith.

    The smoke alarm people may use the sales pitch of: “If you are asleep and there is a fire and you have no alarm, you have a bigger chance of being burned alive if you do not have a smoke alarm. Buy a smoke alarm today and have less risk of being burned alive.*  *In no way should this slogan be construed as to insinuate safety of the consumer.”

    Bam! You are going out to buy a smoke alarm before you go to sleep tonight. That was a good pitch, which caused you to fear living without the smoke alarm.

    A person asking for your faith in their claims will sometimes create an idea of something to fear, like Hell or the devil. To avoid this thing you fear, you must follow a set of rules, (usually including giving money to the person or just believing their claims in general). The better you follow the set of rules, the more unlikely you are to encounter the thing you fear. They may say: “Your tithing is like buying materials for a ladder, and your belief is like building that ladder higher and higher away from the fires of Hell.* *In no way should this slogan be construed to suggest you will receive a ladder.”

    Now, you are attending services twice a day and giving 15% of your paycheck to this person to avoid the hell-fire, due to that great sales pitch.

    Who is it hurting for you to give your money and belief to this person? You feel good, with the assurance that you are safe in the afterlife and that you are surely doing the right thing while you are alive. The person is happy because you believe in them, live according to their lifestyle, and pay for their gas and electric to stay on.

    A role model knows best many times, but if they are not sure all of the claims of their beliefs are true, are they then being a poor leader by having their followers join and participate in their beliefs? Though it would be traditional to have a mentee follow your beliefs, is it right?

    So, you believe in whatever person or idea because it is what you know is best for you, right? If not, then why do you live the way you do? Is it because you have believed in whatever person or idea since you were a wee, little baby? In that case, I would figure at least one of your role models share faith in that person or idea. In that case, are you a role model to someone? Do your mentees share in your beliefs?

    I think it is an interesting point that just because a role model thinks it is the right thing to initiate their mentee into their beliefs, their mentee will lose their choice in what ideas they will believe in until they no longer closely adhere to the lifestyle of their role model, (assuming that the role model guides their followers to be more fervent believers and will not allow them to falter).

    Now, imagine that you had a different role model and you held different beliefs. Your faithfulness would have possibly been directed toward a different person or idea because you were led to believe in this different person or idea since shortly after your birth.

    But what if they are passing on a belief which they may believe to be true, but in actuality is not true? You would be following the rules of a poor leader, since only a poor leader would have people believe in them if they did not know all of their claims are true.

    Finally, for the people who don’t know. If you don’t know why you hold certain beliefs, then you should really just sit still for a while and think about what you believe in. Do you believe all of the claims which affect your lifestyle? If so, then great; but if not, then don’t continue in your lifestyle, acting as if you are something that you are not. Research and check out different beliefs and lifestyles to see if any of them are for you. It is possible that none are.

    I guess all I am trying to say is to ask yourself what you want out of a set of beliefs. Then, think of your current set of beliefs and ask yourself if you have faith in everything you claim to believe and if you are getting what you want out of your current set of beliefs.

    Going back to the mouse, if I was sly enough to have a bird planted and there with a trainer waiting to have the bird retrieve your keys and have it fly back up to you, appearing as if a bird came to return your keys at the will of the little mouse, would you have believed that the little mouse in the wall healed my finger too? In doing so, I might have made $20 bucks off of you. There again, what if little mouse did have the powers to heal my finger and you did not trust to toss your keys out of the window. You would miss out on the possibility of little mouse helping you in the future.

    Don’t always believe what you hear. Don’t always believe what you think you see. Choose carefully and wisely. Your faithfulness in others may end up making you a sucker for whoever gets to you first.

    Is it that the great powers of the world, religions and governments, are using peoples’ beliefs to serve their own purpose? Are the “powers that be” just, or unjust, in their leadership? Socrates’s discussion of justice in Republic would lead one to believe that an unjust ruler or captain would want to lead their followers for their own benefit rather than the benefit of their followers.

    What benefit is there to the followers to blindly follow their master’s lead?

    I understand that a government needs some of its citizens to protect its interests and all of its people; and that a church can provide a community of helpful people and comfort in knowing that they have a community which agrees with many of their beliefs. But when governments and religions have people do things which are inhumane to further their cause, who is really to benefit from these actions?

    Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President

    The Death Penalty

    The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the harshest judicial decree available in 32 states, available nation-wide if sentenced in federal or military court. Many of the 18 states who chose not to have the death penalty available did so upon their induction into statehood.

    While there are many reasons why people were put to death in the past, the current law of the land, the 8th Amendment, disallows cruel and unusual punishment for a crime. Since 1776, several court cases have had rulings interpreting this phrase, and the death penalty has been narrowed down to only be allowed in cases of aggravated murder, given that the murderer is mentally competent.

    There are a number of ways in which one can be put to death, usually at the choice of the prisoner to be executed, including: Electrocution, hanging, gas chamber, firing squad, and (most popularly) lethal injections.

    Now, why do we put people to death? A person is born at the behest of a being more than man (or woman). Is it just for a person, or group of people, to determine whether others’ actions are worthy of death?

    Here is how I see it: We will say that a person decides to shoot a person in a phone booth. The person they shot has a spouse and other relatives. These relatives want justice for the death of their loved one. Some in the group may believe that the just punishment would be for themselves to be able to kill the murderer. This is not possible, legally. Since some of the relatives want blood and are not able to take it themselves, they allow a judge and jury to decide whether this person should die for their crime. If the court decides that the murderer is guilty and it is available for them to levy the death penalty and this penalty is chosen, the relatives of the person may feel as if justice has been served. Thus, the judge, jury, relatives, and all inhabitants of the state or country are vicariously killing a person through the hands of an executioner.

    Why did the relatives want the murderer to die? Is it for closure? Would they have more closure if they were allowed to take the murderer’s life with their own hands?

    I do not believe one can achieve closure through causing the death of one who killed their loved one. Rather, I believe that closure can be better achieved by keeping the murderer alive, imprisoned forever. How would this benefit the bereaved? It is my belief that their anger and bloodlust is caused by a deep unknowing of why the criminal acted the way they did at the time. It is also my belief that the criminal may not know why they acted as they did at the time and by cutting their life short, they may never understand why.

    By keeping the prisoner alive, in time the murderer may realize why they acted as they did and possibly feel remorse for their actions. At the time of realization, the bereaved may be able to learn from the murderer why their relative was killed. This will possibly give the relatives some closure, to know why and that the killer does have remorse for their past actions and do fully realize why they are being punished.

    A society which uses death as a penalty will promote others to use death as a form of punishment for any situation a person sees fit, whether it is that they were directly or indirectly harmed by the person they want to kill or whether it is a random act of hatred toward society.

    I see life imprisonment as a more just punishment for murder, seeing as it is a punishment from the state. The state provides rights and freedoms to its citizens, but a supreme creator provides life, therefore the state should only be able to restrict what it provides and no more.

    Do you believe it is just to sentence someone to death for the crime of aggravated murder? If not or if so, please comment below.

    Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President

    Benjamin Franklin: Rules by Which a Great Empire May Be Reduced to a Small One – 11 September 1773

    For the Public Advertiser.

    Rules by which a GREAT Empire may be reduced to a SMALL ONE.

    An ancient Sage boasted, that tho’ he could not fiddle, he knew how to make a great City of a little one. The Science that I, a modern Simpleton, am about to communicate, is the very reverse.

    I address myself to all Ministers who have the Management of extensive Dominions, which from their very Greatness are become troublesome to govern, because the Multiplicity of their Affairs leaves no Time for fiddling.

    I. In the first Place, Gentlemen, you are to consider, that a great Empire, like a great Cake, is most easily diminish’d at the Edges. Turn your Attention, therefore, first to your remotest Provinces; that as you get rid of them, the next may follow in Order.

    II. That the Possibility of this Separation may always exist, take special Care the Provinces are never incorporated with the Mother Country; that they do not enjoy the same common Rights, the same Privileges in Commerce; and that they are governed by severer Laws, all of your enacting, without allowing them any share in the Choice of the Legislators. By carefully making and preserving such Distinctions, you will (to keep to my simile of the Cake) act like a wise Gingerbread-baker, who, to facilitate a Division, cuts his Dough half through in those Places where, when baked, he would have it broken to Pieces.

    III. These remote Provinces have perhaps been acquir’d, purchas’d, or conquer’d, at the sole Expence of the Settlers, or their Ancestors, without the Aid of the Mother Country. If this should happen to increase her Strength, by their growing Numbers, ready to join in her Wars; her Commerce, by their growing Demand for her Manufactures; or her naval Power, by greater Employment for her Ships and Seamen, they may probably suppose some Merit in this, and that it entitles them to some Favour; you are therefore to forget it all, or resent it, as if they had done you Injury. If they happen to be zealous Whigs, Friends of Liberty, nurtur’d in Revolution Principles, remember all that to their Prejudice, and contrive to punish it: for such Principles, after a Revolution is thoroughly establish’d, are of no more use; they are even odious and abominable.

    IV. However peaceably your Colonies have submitted to your Government, shewn their Affection to your Interest, and patiently borne their Grievances; you are to suppose them always inclin’d to revolt, and treat them accordingly. Quarter Troops among them, who by their Insolence may provoke the rising of Mobs, and by their Bullets and Bayonets suppress them. By this Means, like the Husband who uses his Wife ill from Suspicion, you may in Time convert your Suspicions into Realities.

    V. Remote Provinces must have Governors and Judges, to represent the Royal Person, and execute every where the delegated Parts of his Office and Authority. You Ministers know, that much of the Strength of Government depends on the Opinion of the People; and much of that Opinion on the Choice of Rulers plac’d immediately over them. If you send them wise and good Men for Governors, who study the Interest of the Colonists, and advance their Prosperity, they will think their King wise and good, and that he wishes the Welfare of his Subjects. If you send them learned and upright Men for judges, they will think him a Lover of Justice. This may attach your Provinces more to his Government. You are therefore to be careful whom you recommend for those Offices. If you can find Prodigals, who have ruin’d their Fortunes, broken Gamesters or stockjobbers, these may do well as Governors; for they will probably be rapacious, and provoke the People by their Extortions. Wrangling Proctors and pettifogging Lawyers, too, are not amiss; for they will be for ever disputing and quarrelling with their little Parliaments, if withal they should be ignorant, wrong-headed, and insolent, so much the better. Attorneys’ Clerks and Newgate Solicitors will do for Chief Justices, especially if they hold their Places during your Pleasure; And all will contribute to impress those ideas of your Government, that are proper for a People you would wish to renounce it.

    VI. To confirm these Impressions, and strike them deeper, whenever the Injur’d come to the Capital with Complaints of mal-Administration, Oppression, or Injustice, punish such Suitors with long Delay, enormous Expence, and a final Judgment in Favour of the Oppressor. This will have an admirable Effect every Way. The Trouble of future Complaints will be prevented, and Governors and Judges will be encourag’d to farther Acts of Oppression and Injustice; and thence the People may become more disaffected, and at length desperate.

    VII. When such Governors have crammed their Coffers, and made themselves so odious to the People that they can no longer remain among them, with Safety to their Persons, recall and reward them with Pensions. You may make them Baronets too, if that respectable Order should not think fit to resent it. All will contribute to encourage new Governors in the same Practice, and make the supreme Government, detestable.

    VIII. If when you are engaged in War, your Colonies should vie in liberal Aids of Men and Money against the common Enemy, upon your simple Requisition, and give far beyond their Abilities, reflect that a Penny taken from them by your Power is more honourable to you, than a Pound presented by their Benevolence; despise therefore their voluntary grants, and resolve to harrass them with novel Taxes. They will probably complain to your Parliaments, that they are taxed by a Body in which they have no Representative, and that this is contrary to common Right. They will petition for Redress. Let the Parliaments flout their Claims, reject their Petitions, refuse even to suffer the reading of them, and treat the Petitioners with the utmost Contempt. Nothing can have a better Effect in producing the Alienation propos’d; for though many can forgive Injuries, none ever forgave Contempt.

    IX. In laying these Taxes, never regard the heavy Burthens those remote People already undergo, in defending their own Frontiers, supporting their own provincial Governments, making new Roads, building Bridges, Churches, and other public Edifices, which in old Countries have been done to your Hands by your Ancestors, but which occasion constant Calls and Demands on the Purses of a new People. Forget the Restraints you lay on their Trade for your own Benefit, and the Advantage a Monopoly of this Trade gives your exacting Merchants. Think nothing of the Wealth those Merchants and your Manufacturers acquire by the Colony Commerce; their encreas’d Ability thereby to pay Taxes at Home; their accumulating, in the Price of their Commodities, most of those Taxes, & so levying them from their consuming Customers: all this, and the Employment & Support of thousands of your Poor by the Colonists, you are intirely to forget. But remember to make your arbitrary Tax more grievous to your Provinces, by Public Declarations importing that your Power of taxing them has no Limits; so that when you take from them without their Consent one Shilling in the Pound, you have a clear Right to the other nineteen. This will probably weaken every Idea of Security in their Property, and convince them, that under such a Government they have nothing they can call their own; which can scarce fail of producing the happiest Consequences!

    X. Possibly, indeed, some of them might still comfort themselves, and say, “Though we have no Property, we have yet something left that is valuable; we have constitutional Liberty, both of Person & of Conscience. This King, these Lords, and these Commons who it seems are too remote from us to know us, and feel for us, cannot take from us our Habeas Corpus Right, or our Right of Trial by a Jury of our Neighbours: they cannot deprive us of the exercise of our Religion, alter our ecclesiastical Constitutions, and compel us to be Papists, if they please, or Mahometans.” To annihilate their Comfort, begin by Laws to perplex their Commerce with infinite Regulations, impossible to be remember’d and observ’d; ordain Seizures of their Property for every Failure; take away the trial of such Property by Jury and give it to arbitrary Judges of your own appointing, and of the lowest Characters in the Country, whose Salaries and Emoluments are to arise out of the Duties or Condemnations, and whose appointments are during pleasure. Then let there be a formal Declaration of both Houses, that Opposition to your Edicts is Treason, and that Persons suspected of Treason in the Provinces may, according to some obsolete Law, be seiz’d and sent to the Metropolis of the Empire for Trial; and pass an Act, that those there charg’d with certain other Offences, shall be sent away in Chains from their Friends & Country to be tried in the same Manner for Felony. Then erect a new Court of Inquisition among them, accompanied by an arm’d Force, with Instructions to transport all such suspected Persons; to be ruin’d by the Expence, if they bring over Evidences to prove their Innocence, or be found guilty and hang’d if they can’t afford it. And, lest the People should think you cannot possibly go any farther, pass another solemn declaratory Act, “that King, Lords, and Commons had, hath, and of right ought to have, full Power & Authority to make Statutes of sufficient Force and Validity to bind the unrepresented Provinces IN ALL CASES WHATSOEVER.” This will include spiritual with temporal, and taken together, must operate wonderfully to your Purpose; by convincing them, that they are at Present under a Power something like that spoken of in the Scriptures, which can not only kill their Bodies, but damn their Souls to all Eternity, by compelling them, if it pleases, to worship the Devil.

    XI. To make your Taxes more odious, and more likely to procure Resistance, send from the Capital a Board of Officers to superintend the Collection, compos’d of the most indiscreet, ill-bred, and insolent you can find. Let these have large Salaries out of the extorted Revenue, and live in open, grating Luxury upon the Sweat and Blood of the Industrious; whom they are to worry continually with groundless and expensive Prosecutions before the above-mentioned arbitrary revenue Judges; all at the cost of the Party prosecuted tho’ acquitted, because the King is to pay no Costs. Let these Men, by your Order, be exempted from all the common Taxes and Burthens of the Province, though they and their Property are protected by its Laws. If any revenue Officers are suspected of the least Tenderness for the People, discard them. If others are justly complain’d of, protect and reward them. If any of the Under Officers behave so as to provoke the People to drub them, promote those to better Offices: this will encourage others to procure for themselves such profitable Drubbings, by multiplying such Provocations, and all with work towards the End you aim at.

    XII. Another way to make your Tax odious, is to misapply the Produce of it. If it was originally appropriated for the Defence of the Provinces, the better Support of Government, and the Administration of Justice, where it may be necessary, then apply none of it to that Defence, but bestow it where it is not necessary, in augmented Salaries or Pensions to every Governor, who has distinguish’d himself by his Enmity to the People, and by calumniating them to their Sovereign. This will make them pay it more unwillingly, and be more apt to quarrel with those that collect it and those that impos’d it, who will quarrel again with them, and all shall contribute to your main Purpose, of making them weary of your Government.

    XIII. If the People of any Province have been accustom’d to support their own Governors and Judges to satisfaction, you are to apprehend that such Governors and Judges may be thereby influenc’d to treat the People kindly, and to do them Justice. This is another Reason for applying part of that Revenue in larger Salaries to such Governors and Judges, given, as their Commissions are, during your Pleasure only; forbidding them to take any Salaries from their Provinces; that thus the People may no longer hope any Kindness from their Governors, or (in Crown Cases) any Justice from their Judges. And, as the Money thus misapplied in one Province is extorted from all, probably all will resent the Misapplication.

    XIV. If the Parliaments of your Provinces should dare to claim Rights, or complain of your Administration, order them to be harass’d with repeated Dissolutions. If the same Men are continually return’d by new elections, adjourn their meetings to some country Village, where they cannot be accommodated, & there keep them during Pleasure; for this, you know, is your PREROGATIVE; & an excellent one it is; as you may manage it to promote Discontents among the People, diminish their Respect, and increase their Disaffection.

    XV. Convert the brave, honest officers of your Navy into pimping Tide-waiters and colony Officers of the Customs. Let those, who in Time of War fought gallantly in Defence of the Commerce of their Countrymen, in Peace be taught to prey upon it. Let them learn to be corrupted by great and real Smugglers; but (to shew their diligence) scour with arm’d boats every Bay, Harbour, River, Creek, Cove, or Nook throughout the Coast of your Colonies; stop and detain every Coaster, every Wood-boat, every Fisherman, tumble their cargoes, and even their ballast inside out & upside down; and if a Penn’orth of Pins is found un-enter’d, let the whole be seiz’d and confiscated. Thus shall the Trade of your Colonists suffer more from their friends in Time of Peace, than it did from their Enemies in War. Then let these Boats’ Crews land upon every Farm in their Way, rob the Orchards, steal the Pigs and the Poultry, and insult the Inhabitants. If the injur’d and exasperated farmers, unable to procure other Justice, should attack the agressors, drub them, and burn their Boats; you are to call this high Treason and Rebellion, order Fleets and Armies into their country, and threaten to carry all the Offenders three thousand miles to be hang’d, drawn, and quartered. O! this will work admirably!

    XVI. If you are told of Discontents in your Colonies, never believe that they are general, or that you have given Occasion for them; therefore do not think of applying any Remedy, or of changing any offensive Measure. Redress no Grievance, lest they should be encourag’d to demand the Redress of some other Grievance. Grant no Request that is just and reasonable, lest they should make another that is unreasonable. Take all your Informations of the State of the Colonies from your Governors and Officers in enmity with them. Encourage and reward these leasing-makers; secrete their lying Accusations, lest they should be confuted; but act upon them as the clearest Evidence; and believe nothing you hear from the Friends of the People: suppose all their Complaints to be invented and promoted by a few factious demagogues, whom if you could catch and hang, all would be quiet. Catch and hang a few of them accordingly; and the Blood of the Martyrs shall work Miracles in Favour of your Purpose.

    XVII. If you see rival Nations rejoicing at the Prospect of your Disunion with your Provinces, & endeavouring to promote it; if they translate, publish, and applaud all the Complaints of your discontented Colonists, at the same Time privately stimulating you to severer Measures, let not that alarm or offend you. Why should it, since you all mean the same Thing?

    XVIII. If any Colony should at their own Charge erect a Fortress to secure their Port against the Fleets of a foreign Enemy, get your Governor to betray that Fortress into your Hands. Never think of paying what it cost the Country, for that would look, at least, like some Regard for Justice; but turn it into a Citadel to awe the Inhabitants & curb their Commerce. If they should have lodg’d in such Fortress the very Arms they bought and us’d to aid you in your Conquests, seize them all; it will provoke like Ingratitude added to Robbery. One admirable Effect of these Operations will be, to discourage every other Colony from erecting such Defences, and so your Enemies may more easily invade them; to the great Disgrace of your Government, and of course the Furtherance of your Project.

    XIX. Send Armies into their Country under Pretence of protecting the Inhabitants; but instead of garrisoning the Forts on their Frontiers with those Troops, to prevent Incursions, demolish those Forts, and order the Troops into the Heart of the Country, that the Savages may be encourag’d to attack the frontiers, and that the Troops may be protected by the Inhabitants: This will seem to proceed from your ill Will or your Ignorance, and contribute farther to produce and strengthen an Opinion among them, that you are no longer fit to govern them.

    XX. Lastly, invest the General of your Army in the Provinces, with great and unconstitutional Powers, & free him from the Controul of even your own Civil Governors. Let him have Troops enow under his Command, with all the Fortresses in his Possession; and who knows but (like some provincial Generals in the Roman Empire, and encourag’d by the universal Discontent you have produc’d) he may take it into his Head to set up for himself? If he should, and you have carefully practis’d these few excellent Rules of mine, take my Word for it, all the Provinces will immediately join him; and you will that Day (if you have not done it sooner) get rid of the Trouble of governing them, and all the Plagues attending their Commerce and connection from henceforth & for ever.

    ~Q.E.D.

    Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President