My YouTube Videos

Thank you for visiting my site! Please check out my YouTube videos. Here’s my first video. It is an introduction to my campaign: Here’s my second video. It talks a bit about myself, and asks for people to get the word out about my campaign: Here’s a video of my campaign kickoff speech given at Kirby’s Beer Store on March 3, 2024. Thank you to Carrie Nation and The Speakeasy for allowing me to preempt their show with my speech. Thanks to Kathy for recording this! Thank you for checking them out! Please share the videos all around! Thank you! Don’t forget to check out my articles! Thank you for your support! It’s an uphill road ahead, but this is how it begins. :] Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President

Read More »

A Bill to Limit the Complexity of Bills Introduced to Congress:

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE HERE ASSEMBLED THAT: Section 1. All bills be limited to one topic, including any direct legislatorial or procedural changes pertaining to the topic. And that all bills which may be considered separate topics be split into individual topics before being presented to Congress, in the spirit of sharing clarity. Topics may be reliant upon another bill being passed, and such bills may be written with a preamble of “1Considering Bill xx [and xx, etc.] to be passed into law, BE IT ENACTED…” 1 All intended effects in law shall be presented by the bill writer at the time of presentation to Congress, including specific references where it would affect current and/or pending bills and/or laws. Any pending bills or laws unbeknownst to the bill writer must be presented by Congress members in the know, if consideration is deserved. Only by passing into law of a new bill may any law be interpreted as being bound to another bill or law, giving due consideration to the powers vested in the Judicial Branch of the U.S. A. Section 2. Terms: “One Topic” – So far as a topic may be perceived to include a very similar or related topic, it should not. Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President

Read More »

The Two Party System…Ha

So, how does the two party system benefit you? How does the two party system benefit America? How does the two party system benefit itself? The two party system narrows down your choices to two people who carry opposing views on many things. This way, you have both sides not necessarily saying to vote for their candidate, but saying not to vote for the other candidate. Is that the way it should be? Could there be a system where we choose a decent candidate, not just someone who is “not him/her”? (Could one side “throw the election” by having a terrible candidate?) I think if we got rid of the party system all together, there would be more money available for other people to run, the parties just gravitate the money toward themselves. Did you know that much of elected officials’ time is used making phone calls and making appearances at events to gain more money for their party? Why not gain money for their personal election fund; or better yet, have the election system be affordable enough so they do not have to spend a bunch of time on sales calls? What does the party system provide for The People of The United States of America? From my standpoint, it provides us a narrowed pool of candidates, almost fed to us. It assures that there will be people that, no matter what is the right decision, will choose whatever their party says, since they are wanting to be re-elected.  (As a disclaimer, there are some elected officials, currently belonging to parties, who are good for The United States.) As nice as it would be to have a no party system, we have sunk ourselves into a hole which will be difficult to get out of. The party system assures

Read More »

To Believe or To Doubt? That is the Question.

—This was originally posted long ago. Enjoy. — Truth does not cease because people give up believing it. – Edward Norman Truth does not arise because people do believe it. – Me, Paul C. **Please do not read this entry if you are a child. Ask your parents if they would like to read this before you do. Thanks ** For what reason is it an admirable quality for a person to have belief in the unbelievable? Is that admiration genuine? Or, is it something that is suggested to people by the ones with the unbelievable claims? Does having faith ever hurt the faithful? Does having faith ever help the faithful? Finally, does having faith hurt or help the people or idea you are holding faith in? Say I am telling you a story about what happened to me yesterday… “I was chopping vegetables in the kitchen when the knife accidentally slipped and I chopped my whole finger off. I was worried, but I petitioned to the mouse in the wall, ‘Oh little mouse, use your great power to heal my finger.’ Then I pressed my finger back on and it was magically healed. See?” [Me showing you my finger intact, with no sign of being cut.] “The little mouse in the wall is magical and I knew it. Here, let me show you. Throw your keys out the window and a bird will bring them back. All you need to do is ask the little mouse if it will use its great power to return your keys.” -Would you throw your keys and ask the little mouse if it could use its great powers for your will? If so, then you do really expect a bird to come flying back with them; or are you just testing to see

Read More »

The Death Penalty

The death penalty, or capital punishment, is the harshest judicial decree available in 32 states, available nation-wide if sentenced in federal or military court. Many of the 18 states who chose not to have the death penalty available did so upon their induction into statehood. While there are many reasons why people were put to death in the past, the current law of the land, the 8th Amendment, disallows cruel and unusual punishment for a crime. Since 1776, several court cases have had rulings interpreting this phrase, and the death penalty has been narrowed down to only be allowed in cases of aggravated murder, given that the murderer is mentally competent. There are a number of ways in which one can be put to death, usually at the choice of the prisoner to be executed, including: Electrocution, hanging, gas chamber, firing squad, and (most popularly) lethal injections. Now, why do we put people to death? A person is born at the behest of a being more than man (or woman). Is it just for a person, or group of people, to determine whether others’ actions are worthy of death? Here is how I see it: We will say that a person decides to shoot a person in a phone booth. The person they shot has a spouse and other relatives. These relatives want justice for the death of their loved one. Some in the group may believe that the just punishment would be for themselves to be able to kill the murderer. This is not possible, legally. Since some of the relatives want blood and are not able to take it themselves, they allow a judge and jury to decide whether this person should die for their crime. If the court decides that the murderer is guilty and it is

Read More »

Benjamin Franklin: Rules by Which a Great Empire May Be Reduced to a Small One – 11 September 1773

For the Public Advertiser. Rules by which a GREAT Empire may be reduced to a SMALL ONE. An ancient Sage boasted, that tho’ he could not fiddle, he knew how to make a great City of a little one. The Science that I, a modern Simpleton, am about to communicate, is the very reverse. I address myself to all Ministers who have the Management of extensive Dominions, which from their very Greatness are become troublesome to govern, because the Multiplicity of their Affairs leaves no Time for fiddling. I. In the first Place, Gentlemen, you are to consider, that a great Empire, like a great Cake, is most easily diminish’d at the Edges. Turn your Attention, therefore, first to your remotest Provinces; that as you get rid of them, the next may follow in Order. II. That the Possibility of this Separation may always exist, take special Care the Provinces are never incorporated with the Mother Country; that they do not enjoy the same common Rights, the same Privileges in Commerce; and that they are governed by severer Laws, all of your enacting, without allowing them any share in the Choice of the Legislators. By carefully making and preserving such Distinctions, you will (to keep to my simile of the Cake) act like a wise Gingerbread-baker, who, to facilitate a Division, cuts his Dough half through in those Places where, when baked, he would have it broken to Pieces. III. These remote Provinces have perhaps been acquir’d, purchas’d, or conquer’d, at the sole Expence of the Settlers, or their Ancestors, without the Aid of the Mother Country. If this should happen to increase her Strength, by their growing Numbers, ready to join in her Wars; her Commerce, by their growing Demand for her Manufactures; or her naval Power, by greater

Read More »

Click on Read More on below any of the snippets to jump to the individual posts.

Paid for by Paul Vincent Catanese for President